Skip to content
TapBuff
ZIP

City of Taylor

What EPA’s and Alabama’s records show in this utility’s water: PFAS and lithium; nitrate, arsenic and other regulated chemicals; lead and copper; and violations since 2016, with the certification that handles each result.

Serves
9,339 people
Connections
3,113
Water source
Groundwater
Based in
Taylor, AL
County
Houston
Owner
Local government
Hardness
Moderately hard
The 4 ZIP codes it serves

36301, 36305, 36352, 36375

The short answer

1 result is above the health goal. The worst: Lead, above the health goal. No health-based violations on file since 2016.

What handles it

What was found

PFAS and lithium: EPA UCMR 5, samples taken from Jan. 9, 2023 to Aug. 15, 2023.

Lead and copper: EPA SDWIS monitoring periods ending 2005 to 2026.

Total trihalomethanes (TTHM), fluoride, haloacetic acids (HAA5), nitrate, arsenic and chromium (total): Alabama’s own results, samples taken from June 18, 2020 to Aug. 27, 2026, with EPA’s 2012 to 2019 file for earlier years.

PFAS: None of the six PFAS in EPA’s 2024 drinking water rule was found in this utility’s samples. None of the other 23 PFAS tested for was found either.

EPA’s 2024 PFAS rule, compound by compound

PFASEPA’s limitResult
PFOA4.0 pptNot foundNot found in any of 4 samples, below 4 ppt
PFOS4.0 pptNot foundNot found in any of 4 samples, below 4 ppt
PFHxS10 pptNot foundNot found in any of 4 samples, below 3 ppt
PFNA10 pptNot foundNot found in any of 4 samples, below 4 ppt
HFPO-DA (GenX)10 pptNot foundNot found in any of 4 samples, below 5 ppt
PFBSIndex onlyNot foundNot found in any of 4 samples, below 3 ppt
Hazard IndexPFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA and PFBS together1Doesn’t applyDoesn’t apply: no sampling location found two or more of the four
Results from EPA’s UCMR 5 sampling. “Below” is the lab’s reporting level: a result under it reads as not found, which is not the same as zero. The limits are EPA’s 2024 rule, with compliance due from 2029; EPA has since proposed changes to some of them, explained on each compound’s page. PFBS has no limit of its own and counts only toward the Hazard Index, which adds up the four, each against EPA’s health-based level, from each sampling location’s average, as EPA’s UCMR 5 summary does. It counts only where two or more of the four were found, and is above the limit from 1.5.

Above the health goal1

Lead

Comes from pipes, often your own

Above the health goal

7.3ppb

90th percentile, 2024 to 2026

In the latest period, 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below 7.3 ppb, below EPA’s action level of 15 ppb. The action level drops to 10 ppb on Nov. 1, 2027. EPA’s health goal for lead is zero.

What handles it

Below EPA’s limits5

Lithium

Comes from the source

At EPA’s benchmark, as EPA rounds

12.3ppb

Highest sample, Aug. 3, 2023; found in 2 of 4

The highest sample was 12.3 ppb. As EPA rounds results, that is at EPA’s health reference level of 10 ppb, not above it: EPA counts a result as above it from 15 ppb.

What handles it

No certification claim covers this compound yet.

Total trihalomethanes (TTHM)

Forms or is added in treatment

Below EPA’s limits

26.2ppb

Highest yearly average, 2020 to 2026

2026 average: 5.6 ppb

Averaged by year, the highest was 26.2 ppb, in 2024, below EPA’s legal limit of 80 ppb. Its highest single sample was 47 ppb. In 2026, the latest year on file, its two samples averaged 5.6 ppb. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest yearly average of 9.6 ppb, in 2015.

What handles it

  • NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Reduction”
  • NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Reduction”

Fluoride

Forms or is added in treatment

Below EPA’s limits

0.25ppm

Highest yearly average, 2022 to 2026

2026 average: 0.24 ppm

Averaged by year, the highest was 0.25 ppm, in 2025, below EPA’s legal limit of 4.0 ppm. Its highest single sample was 0.34 ppm. In 2026, the latest year on file, its two samples averaged 0.24 ppm. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest yearly average of 0.19 ppm, in 2013.

What handles it

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Forms or is added in treatment

Below EPA’s limits

3.4ppb

Highest yearly average, 2020 to 2026

2026 average: 1.3 ppb

Averaged by year, the highest was 3.4 ppb, in 2020, below EPA’s legal limit of 60 ppb. Its highest single sample was 3.6 ppb. In 2026, the latest year on file, its two samples averaged 1.3 ppb. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest yearly average of 2.3 ppb, in 2015.

What handles it

No certification claim covers this compound yet.

Nitrate

Comes from the source

Below EPA’s limits

0.27ppm

Highest sample; found in 6 of 14

2026: not found

The highest sample, in 2021, was 0.27 ppm, below EPA’s legal limit of 10 ppm. In 2026, the latest year on file, it wasn’t found in any of its two samples. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest sample of 0.22 ppm, in 2012.

What handles it

  • NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Nitrate/Nitrite Reduction”
  • NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Nitrate/Nitrite (30 ppm challenge)”
Alabama utilities above EPA’s PFAS limits
31 compounds tested and not foundIncluding all six PFAS in EPA’s 2024 rule. Below the reporting level in every sample. Not found is not the same as zero.

From routine monitoring

  • Arsenic
  • Chromium (total)

PFAS and lithium, from EPA’s UCMR 5 sampling

  • 11Cl-PF3OUdS
  • 4:2 FTS
  • 6:2 FTS
  • 8:2 FTS
  • 9Cl-PF3ONS
  • ADONA
  • HFPO-DA (GenX)
  • NEtFOSAA
  • NFDHA
  • NMeFOSAA
  • PFBA
  • PFBS
  • PFDA
  • PFDoA
  • PFEESA
  • PFHpA
  • PFHpS
  • PFHxA
  • PFHxS
  • PFMBA
  • PFMPA
  • PFNA
  • PFOA
  • PFOS
  • PFPeA
  • PFPeS
  • PFTA
  • PFTrDA
  • PFUnA

What handles it

A certification covers specific claims, not a whole standard. Look for these claims on the certifier’s listing, not the box. Wording varies a little: NSF writes “Lead Reduction,” WQA just “Lead.”

At the tap, or for the whole house?

Lead and copper usually come from pipes and fixtures inside or near your home. A whole-house system sits where water enters, so it cannot catch what your own plumbing adds after it. For those, the filter that counts is the one at the tap. How whole-house systems compare.

Filters with those claims on a certifier’s listing

Disclosure: TapBuff earns a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It does not change which standard or filter we name. As an Amazon Associate, TapBuff earns from qualifying purchases. How TapBuff makes money

Compare five-year costs

The best water filters for lead, ranked

Hardness

Moderately hard, 100 mg/L (5.8 grains per gallon), at its one sampling point, 2016 to 2026.

Hardness is calcium and magnesium. EPA sets no limit for it: it shows up as scale on fixtures and in water heaters, and as soap that won’t lather. USGS calls water above 60 mg/L moderately hard, above 120 hard and above 180 very hard.

Softeners compared at 5.8 grains per gallon, salt includedSoftener or salt-free conditioner?Alabama water hardness, utility by utility

Disinfectant

City of Taylor reported disinfecting with chlorine, not chloramine, at all 2 of its sampling points, in its 2023 sampling for EPA.

Chlorine leaves water that sits out for a few days, CDC says. A filter certified for it carries a chlorine claim under NSF/ANSI 42; a shower filter, a free chlorine claim under NSF/ANSI 177. This is what the utility reported for that sampling. Its annual water quality report says what it uses now.

Chlorine vs. chloramineShower filters, by what their listings cover

Violations since 2016

No health-based violations on file with EPA since 2016. There are 4 monitoring or reporting violations: a sample missed, late or not reported.

What this report can’t tell you

  • Everything else. Total trihalomethanes (TTHM), fluoride, haloacetic acids (HAA5), nitrate, arsenic and chromium (total) results here are Alabama’s own from 2020 on, with EPA’s national file for 2012 to 2019. City of Taylor’s own annual report, which it must send you every year, has the contaminants this page does not show.

  • Your own plumbing. Lead results are the 90th percentile across homes the utility samples. Your home’s service line, solder and fixtures decide yours. A certified lab test is the only way to know.

  • What it means for your health. This page reports what the records show and EPA’s limits and goals; it is not medical advice. If you are worried about a health effect, talk to a doctor or your local health department.

  • Anything after the latest data. SDWIS data is from 2026 Q3; UCMR 5 samples are from Jan. 9, 2023 to Aug. 15, 2023; Alabama’s results run from June 18, 2020 to Aug. 27, 2026.

Testing your own tap

City of Taylor’s results are for the water it sends out. What your own service line, solder and fixtures add shows up only in a test of your tap, by a lab Alabama certifies.

The 2 labs Alabama certifies closest to the area City of Taylor serves, in a straight line. Call first: certification is test by test, and not every lab takes samples from homeowners.

  • Houston County Regional Water Lab

    Dothan, AL · about 7 miles

    Certified for bacteria

    (334) 678-2810

  • Polyenvironmental Corporation

    Dothan, AL · about 9 miles

    Certified for bacteria

    (334) 793-4700

Alabama Department of Public Health: Bacteria testing for private wells. Call your county health department to have an environmentalist collect the sample, or collect it yourself in a container from the county health department; there may be a collection fee and a testing fee. Well Water, Alabama Department of Public Health.

All 64 certified labs for Alabama

Sources

PWSID AL0000702. Rebuilt from EPA data on Oct. 18, 2026.

Towns it serves

Also in Houston County

All Alabama utilities

What to do next