Zeigler MHP
What EPA’s and Pennsylvania’s records show in this utility’s water: PFAS; nitrate, arsenic and other regulated chemicals; lead and copper; and violations since 2016, with the certification that handles each result.
- Serves
- 46 people
- Connections
- 23
- Water source
- Groundwater
- Based in
- York, PA
- County
- York
- Owner
- Private
The ZIP code it serves
The short answer
2 results are above EPA’s legal limit, 1 more is above EPA’s new limit, which takes effect in 2029, and 1 more is above the health goal. The worst: Lead, above the action level. 3 health-based violations since 2016.
What handles itWhat was found
PFAS: Pennsylvania’s own results under its PFAS rule, entry point samples taken from Feb. 24, 2025 to Aug. 17, 2026.
Lead and copper: EPA SDWIS monitoring periods ending 1993 to 2007.
Nitrate, total trihalomethanes (TTHM), arsenic, chromium (total), fluoride, haloacetic acids (HAA5) and uranium: Pennsylvania’s own results, samples taken from March 9, 2020 to Sept. 14, 2026, with EPA’s 2012 to 2019 file for earlier years.
PFAS: PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS and PFBS were found, of the six PFAS in EPA’s 2024 drinking water rule; their results are below.
EPA’s 2024 PFAS rule, compound by compound
| PFAS | EPA’s limit | Result |
|---|---|---|
| PFOA | 4.0 ppt | Above EPA’s new limit (2029)17 ppt highest, found in 7 of 7 samples. Details |
| PFOS | 4.0 ppt | Above the health goal3.8 ppt highest, found in 5 of 7 samples. Details |
| PFHxS | 10 ppt | Below EPA’s limits5.1 ppt highest, found in 6 of 7 samples. Details |
| PFNA | 10 ppt | Not foundNot found in any of 7 samples |
| HFPO-DA (GenX) | 10 ppt | Not foundNot found in any of 7 samples |
| PFBS | Index only | Below EPA’s limits17 ppt highest, found in 7 of 7 samples. Details |
| Results from Pennsylvania’s own PFAS monitoring, samples where water enters the pipes; each compound’s card has its four-quarter averages, the way limits are judged. The limits are EPA’s 2024 rule, with compliance due from 2029; EPA has since proposed changes to some of them, explained on each compound’s page. Pennsylvania’s own limits for PFOA and PFOS are in force now. PFBS has no limit of its own and counts only toward EPA’s Hazard Index, which TapBuff works out only from UCMR 5’s averages, so it isn’t given here. | ||
About PFAS certifications
NSF’s PFAS claims are tested to below 20 ppt. EPA’s limit is 4.0 ppt, and EPA says no certification yet shows a filter reaching its levels.
Above the legal limit2
Lead
Comes from pipes, often your own
19.5ppb
90th percentile, 2007
In the latest period, 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below 19.5 ppb, above EPA’s action level of 15 ppb. The action level drops to 10 ppb on Nov. 1, 2027, and this result is at or above that. EPA’s health goal for lead is zero.
What handles it
- NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Lead Reduction”
- NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Lead Reduction”
Nitrate
Comes from the source
11.2ppm
Highest sample; found in 29 of 29
2026 average: 9.7 ppm
From 2025 to 2026, three samples were above EPA’s legal limit of 10 ppm, the highest 11.2 ppm in 2026. The next sample at the same point, within 30 days, kept the average above the limit for two; one has no follow-up sample on file within 30 days. That was also the latest year on file, and its four samples averaged 9.7 ppm. EPA recorded violations for nitrate at this utility in 2025 and 2026. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest sample of 11.6 ppm, in 2014, and EPA recorded a violation in 2017.
What handles it
- NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Nitrate/Nitrite Reduction”
- NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Nitrate/Nitrite (30 ppm challenge)”
Above EPA’s new limit, which takes effect in 20291
PFOA
Comes from the source
17ppt
Highest sample, Feb. 24, 2025; found in 7 of 7
2026 average: 9.9 ppt
The highest sample was 17 ppt, about 4.3 times EPA’s new limit of 4.0 ppt, which takes effect in 2029. EPA’s health goal is zero. Compliance will be judged on a running annual average, not one sample. Averaged over four quarters at one entry point, the way both Pennsylvania’s limit and EPA’s are judged, the highest was 9.8 ppt, for the year to Dec. 31, 2025: below Pennsylvania’s limit of 14 ppt and above EPA’s new limit of 4.0 ppt. In 2026, the latest year on file, its three samples averaged 9.9 ppt.
What handles it
- NSF/ANSI 53 look for “PFOA Reduction”
- NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)”
Above the health goal1
PFOS
Comes from the source
3.8ppt
Highest sample, Feb. 24, 2025; found in 5 of 7
2026 average: 3.0 ppt
The highest sample was 3.8 ppt: below EPA’s new limit of 4.0 ppt, which takes effect in 2029, but above its health goal of zero. Averaged over four quarters at one entry point, the way both Pennsylvania’s limit and EPA’s are judged, the highest was 2.2 ppt, for the year to Sept. 30, 2026: below Pennsylvania’s limit of 18 ppt and below EPA’s new limit of 4.0 ppt. In 2026, the latest year on file, its three samples averaged 3.0 ppt.
What handles it
- NSF/ANSI 53 look for “PFOS Reduction”
- NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS)”
Below EPA’s limits3
PFHxS
Comes from the source
5.1ppt
Highest sample, Feb. 24, 2025; found in 6 of 7
2026 average: 3.1 ppt
The highest sample was 5.1 ppt, below EPA’s new limit of 10 ppt, which takes effect in 2029. Averaged over four quarters at one entry point, the way EPA’s limit is judged, the highest was 2.9 ppt, for the year to Sept. 30, 2026: below EPA’s new limit of 10 ppt. In 2026, the latest year on file, its three samples averaged 3.1 ppt.
What handles it
- NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Total PFAS Reduction”
PFBS
Comes from the source
17ppt
Highest sample, Feb. 24, 2025; found in 7 of 7
2026 average: 12.1 ppt
The highest sample was 17 ppt, below EPA’s hazard index benchmark of 2,000 ppt. PFBS has no legal limit or health goal of its own. In 2026, the latest year on file, its three samples averaged 12.1 ppt.
What handles it
- NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Total PFAS Reduction”
Total trihalomethanes (TTHM)
Forms or is added in treatment
0.56ppb
Highest yearly average, 2022 to 2025
Averaged by year, the highest was 0.56 ppb, in 2025, below EPA’s legal limit of 80 ppb. That was also the latest year on file. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest yearly average of 1.2 ppb, in 2016.
What handles it
- NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Reduction”
- NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Reduction”
7 compounds tested and not foundBelow the reporting level in every sample. Not found is not the same as zero.
From routine monitoring
- Arsenic
- Chromium (total)
- Fluoride
- Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
- Uranium
PFAS, from Pennsylvania’s own monitoring
- HFPO-DA (GenX)
- PFNA
What handles it
A certification covers specific claims, not a whole standard. Look for these claims on the certifier’s listing, not the box. Wording varies a little: NSF writes “Lead Reduction,” WQA just “Lead.”
- NSF/ANSI 53
Claims: Lead Reduction, Nitrate/Nitrite (30 ppm challenge), PFOA Reduction, PFOS Reduction
For: Lead, Nitrate, PFOA, PFOS
Other certifiers’ wording: Total PFAS Reduction; Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA); Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS)
- NSF/ANSI 58
Claims: Lead Reduction, Nitrate/Nitrite Reduction, Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA), Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS)
For: Lead, Nitrate, PFOA, PFOS
Other certifiers’ wording: Nitrate
At the tap, or for the whole house?
Lead and copper usually come from pipes and fixtures inside or near your home. A whole-house system sits where water enters, so it cannot catch what your own plumbing adds after it. For those, the filter that counts is the one at the tap. How whole-house systems compare.
Filters with those claims on a certifier’s listing
Disclosure: TapBuff earns a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It does not change which standard or filter we name. As an Amazon Associate, TapBuff earns from qualifying purchases. How TapBuff makes money
Culligan 10-Cup Pitcher with ZeroWater Technology (ZEROP10)
Pitcher
- IAPMO listing:NSF/ANSI 42NSF/ANSI 53NSF/ANSI 401checked Oct. 9, 2026
Certified for: Lead, Nitrate, PFOA, PFOS
Aquasana SmartFlow Reverse Osmosis (AQ-SFRO2)
Under-sink reverse osmosis
- WQA listing:NSF/ANSI 42NSF/ANSI 53NSF/ANSI 58NSF/ANSI 401checked Oct. 9, 2026
Certified for: Lead, Nitrate, PFOA, PFOS
Countertop reverse osmosis
- IAPMO listing:NSF/ANSI 42NSF/ANSI 53NSF/ANSI 58NSF/ANSI 401checked Oct. 4, 2026
Certified for: Lead, Nitrate, PFOA, PFOS
PUR PLUS 11-Cup Pitcher (PPT111W)
Pitcher
- NSF listing:NSF/ANSI 42NSF/ANSI 53NSF/ANSI 401checked Oct. 4, 2026
- WQA listing:NSF/ANSI 42NSF/ANSI 53NSF/ANSI 401checked Oct. 4, 2026
- IAPMO listing:NSF/ANSI 42NSF/ANSI 53NSF/ANSI 401checked Oct. 4, 2026
Certified for: Lead, PFOA, PFOS
ZeroWater 10 Cup Pitcher (ZP-010)
Pitcher
- IAPMO listing:NSF/ANSI 42NSF/ANSI 53checked Oct. 4, 2026
Certified for: Lead, PFOA, PFOS
The best water filters for lead, ranked
Violations since 2016
| Contaminant or rule | Type | Period | Measured | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | The running average was above the legal limit.EPA: Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | Jan. 1, 2026 to March 31, 2026 | 11.2 MG/L | Archived |
| Nitrate | The running average was above the legal limit.EPA: Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | Jan. 1, 2025 to March 31, 2025 | 10.5 MG/L | Resolved |
| Nitrate | A sample was above the legal limit, for a contaminant judged one sample at a time.EPA: Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Single Sample | Jan. 1, 2017 to March 31, 2017 | 11.1 MG/L | Resolved |
| Health-based violations only. Resolved and archived mean the utility returned to compliance or the state closed the record. 33 monitoring or reporting violations not shown. | ||||
What this report can’t tell you
Everything else. Nitrate, total trihalomethanes (TTHM), arsenic, chromium (total), fluoride, haloacetic acids (HAA5) and uranium results here are Pennsylvania’s own from 2020 on, with EPA’s national file for 2012 to 2019. Zeigler MHP’s own annual report, which it must send you every year, has the contaminants this page does not show.
Your own plumbing. Lead results are the 90th percentile across homes the utility samples. Your home’s service line, solder and fixtures decide yours. A certified lab test is the only way to know.
What it means for your health. This page reports what the records show and EPA’s limits and goals; it is not medical advice. If you are worried about a health effect, talk to a doctor or your local health department.
Anything after the latest data. SDWIS data is from 2026 Q3; UCMR 5 didn’t sample this utility; Pennsylvania’s results run from March 9, 2020 to Sept. 14, 2026; Pennsylvania’s PFAS results run from Feb. 24, 2025 to Aug. 17, 2026.
Testing your own tap
The 3 labs Pennsylvania certifies closest to the area Zeigler MHP serves, in a straight line. Call first: certification is test by test, and not every lab takes samples from homeowners.
Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories Environment Testing, LLC
Lancaster, PA · about 16 miles
Certified for nitrate, lead and copper, metals, minerals and other inorganics, organic chemicals, disinfection byproducts, PFAS
ALS Environmental - Middletown
Middletown, PA · about 20 miles
Certified for bacteria, nitrate, lead and copper, metals, minerals and other inorganics, organic chemicals, disinfection byproducts, PFAS, radioactivity
Owl Hill Laboratories LLC
Lititz, PA · about 22 miles
Certified for bacteria
Penn State Agricultural Analytical Services Laboratory: Drinking water test kits from many county Extension offices, mailed back to the lab overnight with payment. Packages cover bacteria and basic chemistry, with add-ons for nitrate, metals, lead, and mining or gas drilling concerns. The standard package of bacteria, pH and total dissolved solids is $60, or $70 with nitrate; bacteria alone is $40, nitrate $15 and lead $25. Drinking Water Testing, Penn State Agricultural Analytical Services Lab.
All 108 certified labs for PennsylvaniaSources
- EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, file of Oct. 15, 2026
- Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Drinking Water Reporting System, PFAS results read Oct. 17, 2026
- EPA SDWA bulk download (SDWIS federal data), 2026 Q3
- Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Drinking Water Reporting System, results from Jan. 2, 2020 to Oct. 8, 2026, read Oct. 17, 2026
- EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance monitoring data, 2012 to 2019, file of Feb. 5, 2024
- Certified labs: Pennsylvania DEP Laboratory Accreditation Program, accredited labs for drinking water, read Oct. 11, 2026; distances from the Census 2020 ZIP code tabulation area gazetteer
- Limits and goals: each contaminant’s page, with its EPA source.
- How this page is built: methodology.
PWSID PA7670096. Rebuilt from EPA data on Oct. 18, 2026.
What to do next
- Read up on the 4 results above a lineWhat each one does to health, where it comes from, and the certification claim that addresses it.Start with Lead
- Get the utility’s own reportZeigler MHP must send you a water quality report every year. It covers contaminants this page does not show.How to read it
- Test your own tap for leadYour service line, solder and fixtures decide the lead at your faucet, not the utility’s average.Lead in your water: what to do
- Compare certified filtersWhat the filters certified for these results cost over five years, cartridges included.Compare five-year costs