Odessa
What EPA’s and Washington’s records show in this utility’s water: nitrate, arsenic and other regulated chemicals; lead and copper; and violations since 2016, with the certification that handles each result.
- Serves
- 986 people
- Connections
- 501
- Water source
- Groundwater
- County
- Lincoln
- Owner
- Local government
The ZIP code it serves
The short answer
Nothing in EPA’s and Washington’s records for this utility is above a health goal. That covers nitrate, arsenic and other regulated chemicals, plus lead and copper, not everything. No health-based violations on file since 2016.
What was found
Fluoride, total trihalomethanes (TTHM), haloacetic acids (HAA5), nitrate and arsenic: Washington’s own results, samples taken from July 28, 2020 to Sept. 9, 2026, with EPA’s 2012 to 2019 file for earlier years.
Chromium (total): EPA’s compliance monitoring file, samples taken from Jan. 28, 2013 to Dec. 12, 2019. Newer results are in the utility’s annual water quality report.
Below EPA’s limits4
Fluoride
Forms or is added in treatment
2.7ppm
Highest yearly average, 2020 to 2025
2025 average: 1.0 ppm
Averaged by year, the highest was 2.7 ppm, in 2020, below EPA’s legal limit of 4.0 ppm. In 2025, the latest year on file, its two samples averaged 1.0 ppm. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest yearly average of 1.3 ppm, in 2019.
What handles it
- NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Fluoride Reduction”
- NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Fluoride”
Total trihalomethanes (TTHM)
Forms or is added in treatment
31.1ppb
Highest yearly average, 2020 to 2026
2026, one sample: 13.1 ppb
Averaged by year, the highest was 31.1 ppb, in 2020, below EPA’s legal limit of 80 ppb. In 2026, the latest year on file, its one sample was 13.1 ppb. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest yearly average of 25 ppb, in 2019.
What handles it
- NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Reduction”
- NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Reduction”
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Forms or is added in treatment
3.5ppb
Highest yearly average, 2020 to 2026
2026, one sample: 1.9 ppb
Averaged by year, the highest was 3.5 ppb, in 2020, below EPA’s legal limit of 60 ppb. In 2026, the latest year on file, its one sample was 1.9 ppb. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest yearly average of 5.0 ppb, in 2014.
What handles it
No certification claim covers this compound yet.
Nitrate
Comes from the source
0.17ppm
Highest sample; found in 1 of 7
2025: not found
The highest sample, in 2020, was 0.17 ppm, below EPA’s legal limit of 10 ppm. In 2025, the latest year on file, it wasn’t found in any of its two samples.
What handles it
- NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Nitrate/Nitrite Reduction”
- NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Nitrate/Nitrite (30 ppm challenge)”
3 compounds tested and not foundBelow the reporting level in every sample. Not found is not the same as zero.
- Arsenic
- Chromium (total)
- Lead
Violations since 2016
No health-based violations on file with EPA since 2016. There are 34 monitoring or reporting violations: a sample missed, late or not reported.
What this report can’t tell you
Everything else. Fluoride, total trihalomethanes (TTHM), haloacetic acids (HAA5), nitrate and arsenic results here are Washington’s own from 2020 on, with EPA’s national file for 2012 to 2019. Chromium (total) comes from EPA’s file alone, which ends in 2019. Odessa’s own annual report, which it must send you every year, has newer results for those and the contaminants this page does not show.
Your own plumbing. Lead results are the 90th percentile across homes the utility samples. Your home’s service line, solder and fixtures decide yours. A certified lab test is the only way to know.
What it means for your health. This page reports what the records show and EPA’s limits and goals; it is not medical advice. If you are worried about a health effect, talk to a doctor or your local health department.
Anything after the latest data. SDWIS data is from 2026 Q3; UCMR 5 didn’t sample this utility; Washington’s results run from July 28, 2020 to Sept. 9, 2026; EPA’s compliance samples are from Jan. 28, 2013 to Dec. 12, 2019.
Testing your own tap
The 3 labs Washington certifies closest to the area Odessa serves, in a straight line. Call first: certification is test by test, and not every lab takes samples from homeowners.
Soiltest Farm Consultants, Inc. Laboratory
Moses Lake, WA · about 28 miles
Certified for nitrate, minerals and other inorganics
Lincoln County Environmental Health Lab
Davenport, WA · about 36 miles
Certified for bacteria
AV Labs, Inc
Othello, WA · about 40 miles
Certified for bacteria
Sources
- EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, file of Oct. 15, 2026
- EPA SDWA bulk download (SDWIS federal data), 2026 Q3
- Washington State Department of Health, Office of Drinking Water, results from Jan. 1, 2020 to Sept. 29, 2026, read Oct. 8, 2026
- EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance monitoring data, 2012 to 2019, file of Feb. 5, 2024
- Certified labs: Washington State Department of Ecology, Lab Accreditation Program, environmental laboratories accredited for drinking water analyses, read Oct. 10, 2026; distances from the Census 2020 ZIP code tabulation area gazetteer
- Limits and goals: each contaminant’s page, with its EPA source.
- How this page is built: methodology.
PWSID WA5363050. Rebuilt from EPA data on Oct. 18, 2026.
What to do next
- Nothing here is above a health goalIn EPA’s and Washington’s records for this utility. They don’t cover everything, which is why the next step matters.Every contaminant TapBuff tracks
- Get the utility’s own reportOdessa must send you a water quality report every year. It covers contaminants this page does not show, and has newer results than EPA’s national file for the ones here that come from it.How to read it
- Test your own tap for leadYour service line, solder and fixtures decide the lead at your faucet, not the utility’s average.Lead in your water: what to do
- Decide if you want a filter at allA filter for taste or chlorine is a preference, not a need. The standards say what each kind can do.NSF/ANSI standards, decoded