Uintah Highlands Improvement District
What EPA’s and Utah’s records show in this utility’s water: nitrate, arsenic and other regulated chemicals; lead and copper; and violations since 2016, with the certification that handles each result.
- Serves
- 2,485 people
- Connections
- 986
- Water source
- Surface water bought from another system
- Based in
- Ogden, UT
- County
- Weber
- Owner
- Local government
The ZIP code it serves
The short answer
1 result is above EPA’s legal limit, and 2 more are above the health goal. The worst: Total trihalomethanes (TTHM), above the legal limit. 2 health-based violations since 2016.
What handles itWhat was found
Lead and copper: EPA SDWIS monitoring periods ending 2007 to 2024.
Arsenic, fluoride, nitrate and chromium (total): Utah’s own results, samples taken from Dec. 10, 2020 to Aug. 21, 2025, with EPA’s 2012 to 2019 file for earlier years.
Total trihalomethanes (TTHM): EPA’s violation records from 2020 on, with EPA’s 2012 to 2019 file for earlier years.
Haloacetic acids (HAA5): EPA’s compliance monitoring file, samples taken from Nov. 20, 2012 to Aug. 15, 2019. Newer results are in the utility’s annual water quality report.
Above the legal limit1
Total trihalomethanes (TTHM)
Forms or is added in treatment
91.4ppb
Limit violation, 2023
EPA recorded a violation of the legal limit for total trihalomethanes (TTHM) at this utility in 2023. The highest measured level, for July 1, 2023 to Sept. 30, 2023, was an average of 91.4 ppb, above EPA’s legal limit of 80 ppb. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest yearly average of 72.8 ppb, in 2015.
What handles it
- NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Reduction”
- NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Reduction”
Above the health goal2
Lead
Comes from pipes, often your own
6.7ppb
90th percentile, 2022 to 2024
In the latest period, 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below 6.7 ppb, below EPA’s action level of 15 ppb. The action level drops to 10 ppb on Nov. 1, 2027. EPA’s health goal for lead is zero.
What handles it
- NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Lead Reduction”
- NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Lead Reduction”
Arsenic
Comes from the source
0.43ppb
Highest yearly average, 2022 to 2025
2025: not found
Averaged by year, the highest was 0.43 ppb, in 2022: below EPA’s legal limit of 10 ppb, but above its health goal of zero. Its highest single sample was 0.7 ppb. In 2025, the latest year on file, it wasn’t found in any of its three samples.
What handles it
- NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Arsenic (Pentavalent)<=50 ppb Reduction”
- NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Arsenic (Pentavalent)<=50 ppb Reduction”
Below EPA’s limits3
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Forms or is added in treatment
24.3ppb
Highest yearly average, 2012 to 2019
2019, one sample: 22.8 ppb
Averaged by year, the highest was 24.3 ppb, in 2012, below EPA’s legal limit of 60 ppb. Its highest single sample was 38.8 ppb. In 2019, the latest year on file, its one sample was 22.8 ppb.
What handles it
No certification claim covers this compound yet.
Fluoride
Forms or is added in treatment
0.11ppm
Highest yearly average, 2022 to 2025
2025 average: 0.043 ppm
Averaged by year, the highest was 0.11 ppm, in 2022, below EPA’s legal limit of 4.0 ppm. Its highest single sample was 0.19 ppm. In 2025, the latest year on file, its three samples averaged 0.043 ppm. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest yearly average of 0.067 ppm, in 2016.
What handles it
- NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Fluoride Reduction”
- NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Fluoride”
Nitrate
Comes from the source
0.26ppm
Highest sample; found in 11 of 18
2025 average: 0.12 ppm
The highest sample, in 2022, was 0.26 ppm, below EPA’s legal limit of 10 ppm. In 2025, the latest year on file, its three samples averaged 0.12 ppm. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest sample of 0.44 ppm, in 2015.
What handles it
- NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Nitrate/Nitrite Reduction”
- NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Nitrate/Nitrite (30 ppm challenge)”
One compound tested and not foundBelow the reporting level in every sample. Not found is not the same as zero.
- Chromium (total)
What handles it
A certification covers specific claims, not a whole standard. Look for these claims on the certifier’s listing, not the box. Wording varies a little: NSF writes “Lead Reduction,” WQA just “Lead.”
- NSF/ANSI 53
Claims: Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Reduction, Lead Reduction, Arsenic (Pentavalent)<=50 ppb Reduction
For: Total trihalomethanes (TTHM), Lead, Arsenic
Other certifiers’ wording: VOC Reduction; Arsenic (III) (50 ppb influent level)
- NSF/ANSI 58
Claims: Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Reduction, Lead Reduction, Arsenic (Pentavalent)<=50 ppb Reduction
For: Total trihalomethanes (TTHM), Lead, Arsenic
Other certifiers’ wording: Arsenic (Pentavalent)<=300 ppb Reduction; Arsenic (V) (300 ppb influent level)
At the tap, or for the whole house?
Lead and copper usually come from pipes and fixtures inside or near your home. A whole-house system sits where water enters, so it cannot catch what your own plumbing adds after it. For those, the filter that counts is the one at the tap. How whole-house systems compare.
Filters with those claims on a certifier’s listing
Disclosure: TapBuff earns a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It does not change which standard or filter we name. As an Amazon Associate, TapBuff earns from qualifying purchases. How TapBuff makes money
Aquasana SmartFlow Reverse Osmosis (AQ-SFRO2)
Under-sink reverse osmosis
- WQA listing:NSF/ANSI 42NSF/ANSI 53NSF/ANSI 58NSF/ANSI 401checked Oct. 9, 2026
Certified for: Total trihalomethanes (TTHM), Lead, Arsenic
Brondell Capella RC250 Reverse Osmosis System
Under-sink reverse osmosis
- WQA listing:NSF/ANSI 42NSF/ANSI 53NSF/ANSI 58NSF/ANSI 401checked Oct. 9, 2026
Certified for: Total trihalomethanes (TTHM), Lead, Arsenic
Countertop reverse osmosis
- IAPMO listing:NSF/ANSI 42NSF/ANSI 53NSF/ANSI 58NSF/ANSI 401checked Oct. 4, 2026
Certified for: Total trihalomethanes (TTHM), Lead, Arsenic
Aquasana Clean Water Machine (AQ-CWM2)
Countertop
- WQA listing:NSF/ANSI 42NSF/ANSI 53NSF/ANSI 401checked Oct. 9, 2026
Certified for: Total trihalomethanes (TTHM), Lead
Brita Hub Countertop Water Filter System (87340)
Countertop
- WQA listing:NSF/ANSI 42NSF/ANSI 53NSF/ANSI 401checked Oct. 9, 2026
- IAPMO listing:NSF/ANSI 53checked Oct. 9, 2026
Certified for: Total trihalomethanes (TTHM), Lead
Violations since 2016
| Contaminant or rule | Type | Period | Measured | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | The running average was above the legal limit.EPA: Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average | July 1, 2023 to Sept. 30, 2023 | 91.4 UG/L | Resolved |
| Groundwater Rule | A significant problem found in a state inspection was not fixed on time.EPA: Failure To Address Deficiency | April 4, 2018 | — | Resolved |
| Health-based violations only. Resolved and archived mean the utility returned to compliance or the state closed the record. 8 monitoring or reporting violations not shown. | ||||
What this report can’t tell you
Everything else. Arsenic, fluoride, nitrate and chromium (total) results here are Utah’s own from 2020 on, with EPA’s national file for 2012 to 2019. Haloacetic acids (HAA5) comes from EPA’s file alone, which ends in 2019. Uintah Highlands Improvement District’s own annual report, which it must send you every year, has newer results for those and the contaminants this page does not show.
Your own plumbing. Lead results are the 90th percentile across homes the utility samples. Your home’s service line, solder and fixtures decide yours. A certified lab test is the only way to know.
What it means for your health. This page reports what the records show and EPA’s limits and goals; it is not medical advice. If you are worried about a health effect, talk to a doctor or your local health department.
Anything after the latest data. SDWIS data is from 2026 Q3; UCMR 5 didn’t sample this utility; Utah’s results run from Dec. 10, 2020 to Aug. 21, 2025; EPA’s compliance samples are from Nov. 20, 2012 to Aug. 15, 2019.
Testing your own tap
The 3 labs Utah certifies closest to the area Uintah Highlands Improvement District serves, in a straight line. Call first: certification is test by test, and not every lab takes samples from homeowners.
Weber Basin Water Quality Laboratory
Layton, UT · about 7 miles
Certified for bacteria, nitrate, lead and copper, metals, minerals and other inorganics, disinfection byproducts
RJ Analytical LLC
Pleasant View, UT · about 9 miles
Certified for bacteria
Davis County Environmental Health Laboratory
Clearfield, UT · about 10 miles
Certified for bacteria, minerals and other inorganics
Sources
- EPA UCMR 5 occurrence data, file of Oct. 15, 2026
- EPA SDWA bulk download (SDWIS federal data), 2026 Q3
- Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Drinking Water, results from Jan. 3, 2020 to Oct. 1, 2026, read Oct. 8, 2026
- EPA Six-Year Review 4 compliance monitoring data, 2012 to 2019, file of Feb. 5, 2024
- Certified labs: Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Drinking Water, certified laboratories, read Oct. 10, 2026; distances from the Census 2020 ZIP code tabulation area gazetteer
- Limits and goals: each contaminant’s page, with its EPA source.
- How this page is built: methodology.
PWSID UTAH29021. Rebuilt from EPA data on Oct. 18, 2026.
What to do next
- Read up on the 3 results above a lineWhat each one does to health, where it comes from, and the certification claim that addresses it.Start with Total trihalomethanes (TTHM)
- Get the utility’s own reportUintah Highlands Improvement District must send you a water quality report every year. It covers contaminants this page does not show, and has newer results than EPA’s national file for the ones here that come from it.How to read it
- Test your own tap for leadYour service line, solder and fixtures decide the lead at your faucet, not the utility’s average.Lead in your water: what to do
- Compare certified filtersWhat the filters certified for these results cost over five years, cartridges included.Compare five-year costs