Skip to content
TapBuff

Worden Ballantine Yellowstone

What EPA’s and Montana’s records show in this utility’s water: nitrate, arsenic and other regulated chemicals; lead and copper; and violations since 2016, with the certification that handles each result.

Serves
800 people
Connections
320
Water source
Groundwater
Based in
Ballantine, MT
County
Yellowstone
Owner
Local government
The 2 ZIP codes it serves

59006, 59088

The short answer

1 result is above EPA’s legal limit, and 3 more are above the health goal. The worst: Nitrate, above the legal limit. 8 health-based violations since 2016.

What handles it

What was found

Lead and copper: EPA SDWIS monitoring periods ending 2015 to 2025.

Copper: EPA’s file records a utility’s copper only when it exceeds the action level. The last here was 2.5 ppm, for the period ending Sept. 30, 1999. None since is on file, so it is not counted as a current finding.

Nitrate, uranium, arsenic, total trihalomethanes (TTHM), haloacetic acids (HAA5), fluoride and chromium (total): Montana’s own results, samples taken from Jan. 20, 2020 to Sept. 29, 2026, with EPA’s 2012 to 2019 file for earlier years.

Above the legal limit1

Nitrate

Comes from the source

Above the legal limit

12.4ppm

Highest sample; found in 84 of 84

2026 average: 2.9 ppm

From 2020 to 2025, 13 samples were above EPA’s legal limit of 10 ppm, the highest 12.4 ppm in 2025. The next sample at the same point, within 30 days, kept the average above the limit for nine; four have no follow-up sample on file within 30 days. In 2026, the latest year on file, its nine samples averaged 2.9 ppm. EPA recorded violations for nitrate at this utility in 2020, 2021, 2024 and 2025. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest sample of 12.4 ppm, in 2019, and EPA recorded a violation in 2019.

What handles it

  • NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Nitrate/Nitrite Reduction”
  • NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Nitrate/Nitrite (30 ppm challenge)”

Above the health goal3

Uranium

Comes from the source

Above the health goal

11.8ppb

Highest yearly average, 2025

Averaged by year, the highest was 11.8 ppb, in 2025: below EPA’s legal limit of 30 ppb, but above its health goal of zero. Its highest single sample was 12.3 ppb. That is the only year on file. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest yearly average of 10.3 ppb, in 2019.

What handles it

Lead

Comes from pipes, often your own

Above the health goal

3.0ppb

90th percentile, 2023 to 2025

In the latest period, 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below 3.0 ppb, below EPA’s action level of 15 ppb. The action level drops to 10 ppb on Nov. 1, 2027. EPA’s health goal for lead is zero.

What handles it

Arsenic

Comes from the source

Above the health goal

2.0ppb

Highest yearly average, 2020 to 2025

2025 average: 1.5 ppb

Averaged by year, the highest was 2.0 ppb, in 2020: below EPA’s legal limit of 10 ppb, but above its health goal of zero. In 2025, the latest year on file, its two samples averaged 1.5 ppb. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest yearly average of 3.0 ppb, in 2016.

What handles it

  • NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Arsenic (Pentavalent)<=50 ppb Reduction”
  • NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Arsenic (Pentavalent)<=50 ppb Reduction”

Below EPA’s limits3

Total trihalomethanes (TTHM)

Forms or is added in treatment

Below EPA’s limits

37ppb

Highest yearly average, 2020 to 2026

2026, one sample: 14 ppb

Averaged by year, the highest was 37 ppb, in 2024, below EPA’s legal limit of 80 ppb. In 2026, the latest year on file, its one sample was 14 ppb. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest yearly average of 41 ppb, in 2018.

What handles it

  • NSF/ANSI 53 look for “Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Reduction”
  • NSF/ANSI 58 look for “Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Reduction”

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Forms or is added in treatment

Below EPA’s limits

20ppb

Highest yearly average, 2020 to 2026

2026, one sample: 3.5 ppb

Averaged by year, the highest was 20 ppb, in 2024, below EPA’s legal limit of 60 ppb. In 2026, the latest year on file, its one sample was 3.5 ppb. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest yearly average of 12.8 ppb, in 2013.

What handles it

No certification claim covers this compound yet.

Fluoride

Forms or is added in treatment

Below EPA’s limits

0.55ppm

Highest yearly average, 2022 to 2025

2025 average: 0.35 ppm

Averaged by year, the highest was 0.55 ppm, in 2022, below EPA’s legal limit of 4.0 ppm. Its highest single sample was 0.6 ppm. In 2025, the latest year on file, its two samples averaged 0.35 ppm. Earlier, from 2012 to 2019, EPA’s file shows a highest yearly average of 0.6 ppm, in 2016.

What handles it

One compound tested and not foundBelow the reporting level in every sample. Not found is not the same as zero.
  • Chromium (total)

What handles it

A certification covers specific claims, not a whole standard. Look for these claims on the certifier’s listing, not the box. Wording varies a little: NSF writes “Lead Reduction,” WQA just “Lead.”

  • NSF/ANSI 53

    Claims: Nitrate/Nitrite (30 ppm challenge), Lead Reduction, Arsenic (Pentavalent)<=50 ppb Reduction

    For: Nitrate, Lead, Arsenic

    Other certifiers’ wording: Arsenic (III) (50 ppb influent level)

  • NSF/ANSI 58

    Claims: Nitrate/Nitrite Reduction, Uranium, Lead Reduction, Arsenic (Pentavalent)<=50 ppb Reduction

    For: Nitrate, Uranium, Lead, Arsenic

    Other certifiers’ wording: Nitrate; Arsenic (Pentavalent)<=300 ppb Reduction; Arsenic (V) (300 ppb influent level)

At the tap, or for the whole house?

Lead and copper usually come from pipes and fixtures inside or near your home. A whole-house system sits where water enters, so it cannot catch what your own plumbing adds after it. For those, the filter that counts is the one at the tap. How whole-house systems compare.

Filters with those claims on a certifier’s listing

Disclosure: TapBuff earns a commission if you buy through some links on this page. It does not change which standard or filter we name. As an Amazon Associate, TapBuff earns from qualifying purchases. How TapBuff makes money

Compare five-year costs

The best reverse osmosis systems, ranked

The best water filters for lead, ranked

Violations since 2016

Contaminant or ruleTypePeriodMeasuredStatus
Nitrate-NitriteA sample was above the legal limit, for a contaminant judged one sample at a time.EPA: Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Single SampleApril 1, 2025 to June 30, 202511.2 MG/LArchived
Nitrate-NitriteA sample was above the legal limit, for a contaminant judged one sample at a time.EPA: Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Single SampleJan. 1, 2025 to March 31, 202512.4 MG/LArchived
Nitrate-NitriteA sample was above the legal limit, for a contaminant judged one sample at a time.EPA: Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Single SampleJan. 1, 2024 to March 31, 202411 MG/LArchived
Nitrate-NitriteA sample was above the legal limit, for a contaminant judged one sample at a time.EPA: Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Single SampleApril 1, 2021 to June 30, 202110 MG/LArchived
Surface Water Treatment RuleWater drawn from a river, lake or reservoir was not filtered as required.EPA: Failure to Filter (SWTR)March 22, 2021—Unaddressed
Nitrate-NitriteA sample was above the legal limit, for a contaminant judged one sample at a time.EPA: Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Single SampleApril 1, 2020 to June 30, 202011.3 MG/LArchived
Nitrate-NitriteA sample was above the legal limit, for a contaminant judged one sample at a time.EPA: Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Single SampleJan. 1, 2020 to March 31, 202010.1 MG/LArchived
Nitrate-NitriteA sample was above the legal limit, for a contaminant judged one sample at a time.EPA: Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Single SampleApril 1, 2019 to June 30, 201912 MG/LArchived
Health-based violations only. Resolved and archived mean the utility returned to compliance or the state closed the record. 9 monitoring or reporting violations not shown.

What this report can’t tell you

  • Everything else. Nitrate, uranium, arsenic, total trihalomethanes (TTHM), haloacetic acids (HAA5), fluoride and chromium (total) results here are Montana’s own from 2020 on, with EPA’s national file for 2012 to 2019. Worden Ballantine Yellowstone’s own annual report, which it must send you every year, has the contaminants this page does not show.

  • Your own plumbing. Lead results are the 90th percentile across homes the utility samples. Your home’s service line, solder and fixtures decide yours. A certified lab test is the only way to know.

  • What it means for your health. This page reports what the records show and EPA’s limits and goals; it is not medical advice. If you are worried about a health effect, talk to a doctor or your local health department.

  • Anything after the latest data. SDWIS data is from 2026 Q3; UCMR 5 didn’t sample this utility; Montana’s results run from Jan. 20, 2020 to Sept. 29, 2026.

Testing your own tap

Worden Ballantine Yellowstone’s results are for the water it sends out. What your own service line, solder and fixtures add shows up only in a test of your tap, by a lab Montana certifies.

The lab Montana certifies closest to the area Worden Ballantine Yellowstone serves, in a straight line. Call first: certification is test by test, and not every lab takes samples from homeowners.

  • Energy Laboratories, Inc.

    Billings, MT · about 27 miles

    Certified for bacteria, minerals and other inorganics, organic chemicals

    (800) 735-4489

Montana State Environmental Laboratory: Private well testing packages for bacteria, metals, nutrients, anions, organic chemicals and more, open to the public. Samples can be mailed, sent by the lab's free courier, or dropped off at the lab. Environmental Laboratory, Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services.

All 36 certified labs for Montana

Sources

PWSID MT0000022. Rebuilt from EPA data on Oct. 18, 2026.